The text presents an argument to show that Penrose tilings must be aperodic which depends on inflation of the tiling. However any periodic tiling is built on a lattice of polygons. In particular, the semiregular tessellations are built on lattices of rhombs or hexagons. All of these lattices have symmetry of scale - that is, for example, the rhombs can be grouped 4 at a time to form larger, similar rhombs, which can serve as a framework for an inflated version of the original tiling, and this process can be repeated to produce larger and larger versions of the original tiling. Thus if P and P' are minumum distance d apart in the original tiling, they will eventually be contained in the same tile in a large enough inflation.
Thus according to the text argument, this shows the tiling cannot be periodic, But we already know that the examples we are considering are periodic, so this argument is insufficient, and cannot constitute a complete proof that Penrose tilings are not periodic.
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Tuesday, October 19, 2010
Friday, October 15, 2010
Monday, October 11, 2010
Sunday, October 10, 2010
Further information on tilings
This site gives a more thorough study of tilings using regular polygons.
http://www.probabilitysports.com/tilings.html
http://www.probabilitysports.com/tilings.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)